Citation
Gagliano, Monica (2016) What would the Babel fish say?. Animal Sentience 3(20)
Commentary Type
Invited Commentary
Thread
Brian Key, Why fish do not feel pain
Abstract
Starting with its title, Key’s (2016) target article advocates the view that fish do not feel pain. The author describes the neuroanatomical, physiological and behavioural conditions involved in the experience of pain in humans and rodents and confidently applies analogical arguments as though they were established facts in support of the negative conclusion about the inability of fish to feel pain. The logical reasoning, unfortunately, becomes somewhat incoherent, with the arbitrary application of the designated human criteria for an analogical argument to one animal species (e.g., rodents) but not another (fish). Research findings are reported selectively, and questionable interpretations are invoked to support the author’s position. In this commentary, I briefly examine two of the analogies presented in Key’s target article and highlight the role (and consequences) that personal opinions and preconceptions have in issues concerning human ethical responsibilities toward the welfare of non-human species.
DOI
10.51291/2377-7478.1044
Included in
Animal Studies Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, Botany Commons, Cognition and Perception Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Evolution Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, Philosophy of Science Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, Zoology Commons