Citation
Ross, Don (2018) Two fallacies in comparisons between humans and non-humans. Animal Sentience 23(13)
Thread
Colin A. Chapman and Michael A. Huffman, Why do we want to think humans are different?
Abstract
The hypothesis that humans are superior to non-humans by virtue of higher cognitive powers is often supported by two recurrent fallacies: (1) that any competence shown by humans but not by our closest living relatives (apes) must be unique to humans; and (2) that grades of intelligence can be inferred from behavior without regard to motivational structures.
DOI
10.51291/2377-7478.1388
Included in
Cognition and Perception Commons, Cognitive Neuroscience Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Evolution Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, Zoology Commons