Citation
Schnell, Alexandra and Vallortigara, Giorgio (2019) ‘Mind’ is an ill-defined concept: Considerations for future cephalopod research. Animal Sentience 26(16)
Thread
Jennifer Mather, What is in an octopus's mind?
Abstract
Scientific discussions about the ‘mind’ of an octopus are empirically vacuous and should be confined to folk psychology. This form of labelling is unhelpful for science and should be replaced by specific mechanistic accounts of behavior and associated neural structures, which are amenable to rigorous scientific investigation. Mather provides a detailed review of octopus behavior, but rather than making unquantifiable assumptions about what orchestrates octopus behavior, efforts should focus on investigating cognitive mechanisms that can be measured. In this commentary, we outline two lines of research that include quantifiable methods to facilitate a more robust understanding of cephalopod behaviors and their cognitive underpinnings.
DOI
10.51291/2377-7478.1502
Included in
Cognition and Perception Commons, Cognitive Neuroscience Commons, Evolution Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, Zoology Commons