Citation
Paez, Eze (2020) Preserving nature for the benefit of all sentient individuals. Animal Sentience 27(18)
Thread
Adrian Treves, Francisco J. Santiago-Ávila, and William S. Lynn, Just preservation
Abstract
I agree with Treves et al.’s proposal for a preservation ethics based on the principle that nonhuman well-being is a matter of justice and compassion. In this commentary, I advance two objections. First, only sentient beings, rather than all life, belong in the moral community. Second, given that nature is probably harmful overall for sentient individuals, preserving it for the benefit of future human and nonhuman generations requires us to modify it as far as practicable.
DOI
10.51291/2377-7478.1551
Included in
Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Evolution Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, Zoology Commons