Citation
Lifshin, Uri (2022) Motivated science: What humans gain from denying animal sentience. Animal Sentience 31(19)
Thread
Andrew N. Rowan, Joyce M. D'Silva, Ian J.H. Duncan, and Nicholas Palmer, Animal sentience: history, science, and politics
Abstract
Resistance to the idea that non-human animals are sentient resembles erstwhile resistance to the theory that the earth is not the centre of the universe, or that humans evolved from “apes”. All these notions are psychologically threatening. They can remind people of their own creatureliness and mortality and might make them feel guilty or uncertain about their way of life. An honest debate over animal sentience, welfare and rights should consider the human motivation to deprive animals of these things in the first place. I briefly review empirical evidence on the psychological function of denying animal minds.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.51291/2377-7478.1757
Included in
Animal Law Commons, Animal Studies Commons, Comparative Psychology Commons, Personality and Social Contexts Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Social Psychology Commons, Zoology Commons